Anki FSRS Calculator: Target Retention & Review Time
Your desired retention is probably wrong, and it's costing you hundreds of reviews a week. Calibrate your target retention to see the exact trade-off between recall and daily review burden.
What Should My FSRS Target Retention Be?
For most learners, the optimal Anki FSRS target retention is 0.88 to 0.90 (88%–90%), with 0.90 serving as the official default. This target balances maximum board exam recall against daily study hours. Lowering retention to 0.84–0.85 during intense clinical rotations cuts review volume by 30%–35%, while rates above 0.90 trigger exponential review overload.
Simulation Parameters
FSRS-4.5 / 5.0 MathCognitive Efficiency Verdict
Optimal Board Balance: 90% retention is the evidence-based sweet spot for USMLE exams. You maintain strong diagnostic recall without hitting exponential review fatigue.
Target Retention Trade-Off Matrix
See how your daily workload changes as you adjust your target retention under FSRS:
| Target Retention | Daily Reviews | Daily Study Time | Monthly Commitment | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80% | 165 reviews | 22 min/day | 11 hrs/mo | Extreme triage / short rotations |
| 85% | 227 reviews | 30 min/day | 15 hrs/mo | Clerkship sweet spot (30% time saved) |
| 90% | 350 reviews | 47 min/day | 23.5 hrs/mo | Gold standard for Step 1 & Step 2 CK |
| 95% | 719 reviews | 96 min/day | 48 hrs/mo | Diminishing returns / severe review overload |
Understanding the Retention vs. Review Volume Curve
In cognitive psychology and spaced repetition mathematics, the relationship between target retrievability and review frequency is non-linear. In the FSRS algorithm, inter-repetition intervals scale inversely with target retrievability (I ∝ −ln(R)), meaning that as you demand near-perfect recall (>90%), review intervals must contract exponentially.
Dialing desired retention back from 90% to 85% yields an estimated 30% to 35% reduction in daily review volume based on FSRS interval formulas. In large-scale empirical benchmarks across millions of review logs, FSRS achieves equivalent retention with 20% to 30% fewer reviews than legacy SM-2 (Ye et al., 2022). This workload dividend reclaims 15–20+ hours per month for clinical question banks (UWorld, Amboss) and high-yield problem solving.
For the full settings walkthrough, including learning steps, relearning steps, and when to press Optimize on your FSRS parameters, see our FSRS vs SM-2 settings guide.
Frequently Asked Questions
Primary Literature & System Citations
- FSRS Algorithm & Empirical Benchmark: Ye J, Su J, Cao Y. A Stochastic Shortest Path Algorithm for Optimizing Spaced Repetition Scheduling. Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD '22). 2022:4381-4390. doi:10.1145/3534678.3539081.[ACM Digital Library][arXiv:2202.04600]
- Spaced Repetition & Forgetting Index Foundations: Woźniak PA, Gorzelańczyk EJ. Optimization of repetition spacing in the acquisition of knowledge. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 1994;54(1):59-62.[PubMed PMID: 7943024]
- Official FSRS Implementation & Default Specifications: Ankitects. Deck Options: Free Spaced Repetition Scheduler (FSRS). Anki Manual. Published 2023; updated 2024.[Anki Manual Documentation]
- Workload-Retention Trade-off & Optimal Retention Derivation: Ye J. The Optimal Retention. FSRS4Anki Wiki. Open Spaced Repetition.[GitHub Wiki Reference]